DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek or Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-04.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) scores 31.1 points higher (54.2 vs 23.1) but costs 4.1× as much to run the benchmark ($5725 vs $1402; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) when you need intelligence above 23.1, and DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when 23.1 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.1 | 54.2 | +134.6% Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is 2.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,401.88 | $5,725.02 | +308.4% Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is 4.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 34.10s | 10.19s | −70.1% Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is 70.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max): 134.6% more intelligence, 308.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 70.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.40 for $4766.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)Gemini 4 Carbon (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/gemini-4-carbon-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/gemini-4-carbon-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill