DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) vs GLM-5.3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) by DeepSeek or GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) scores 1.7 points higher (36.0 vs 34.3) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($1122 vs $1013; both premium class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GLM-5.3 (Low).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) | GLM-5.3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 36.0 | 34.3 | −4.7% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 4.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,122.27 | $1,012.50 | −9.8% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 9.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.87s | 31.17s | +20.5% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 20.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.32 / $3.96 | $1.40 / $4.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
GLM-5.3 (Low) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max): 4.7% less intelligence, 9.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 20.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)GLM-5.3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/glm-5-3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-pro/glm-5-3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill