Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 7.2 points higher (16.1 vs 8.9) but costs 56× as much to run the benchmark ($823 vs $14.7; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 2.5 Pro when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 8.9 | −44.7% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 44.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $14.68 | −98.2% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 98.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.13s | 57.75s | +112.9% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 112.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.02 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 44.7% less intelligence, 98.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 112.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
Gemini 2.5 ProGemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/gemma-4-e4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/gemma-4-e4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill