Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 2.1 points higher (16.1 vs 14.0) but costs 3.3× as much to run the benchmark ($823 vs $250; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 2.5 Pro when you need intelligence above 14.0, and Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) when 14.0 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 14.0 | −13.0% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 13.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $250.37 | −69.6% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 69.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.37s | 5.89s | −78.5% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 78.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $1.25 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 13.0% less intelligence, 69.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 78.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 2.5 ProGrok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/grok-4-3-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/grok-4-3-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill