Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Grok 4.5 (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Grok 4.5 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.5 (High) scores 22.7 points higher (38.8 vs 16.1) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1244 vs $823; both premium class). Pick Grok 4.5 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 2.5 Pro.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Grok 4.5 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 38.8 | +141.0% Grok 4.5 (High) is 2.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $1,243.85 | +51.2% Grok 4.5 (High) is 51.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.94s | 19.45s | −30.4% Grok 4.5 (High) is 30.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Grok 4.5 (High) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 141.0% more intelligence, 51.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 30.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Grok 4.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 2.5 ProGrok 4.5 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/grok-4-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/grok-4-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill