Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 147.2% more intelligence, 55.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 86.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 39.8 | +147.2% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 2.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $362.72 | −55.9% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 55.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.13s | 50.57s | +86.4% Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 86.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.15 / $0.47 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Gemini 2.5 ProQwen3.8-Flash-NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/qwen3-8-flash-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/qwen3-8-flash-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill