Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores 8.3 points higher (16.1 vs 7.8) but costs 5.2× as much to run the benchmark ($823 vs $159; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 2.5 Pro when you need intelligence above 7.8, and Solar Pro 3 when 7.8 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 16.1 | 7.8 | −51.6% Solar Pro 3 is 51.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $822.85 | $159.22 | −80.7% Solar Pro 3 is 80.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 27.13s | 18.94s | −30.2% Solar Pro 3 is 30.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.25 / $10.0 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: 51.6% less intelligence, 80.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 30.2% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Gemini 2.5 ProSolar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-2-5-pro/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill