Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) scores 5.1 points higher (20.7 vs 15.6) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($331 vs $156; both mid-range class). Pick GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 20.7 | +32.7% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 32.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $331.24 | +112.5% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 2.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.15s | 53.29s | +766.5% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 766.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $0.20 / $1.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 32.7% more intelligence, 112.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 766.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteGPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/gpt-5-4-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/gpt-5-4-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill