Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 10.2 points higher (25.8 vs 15.6) but costs 6.4× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $156; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 15.6, and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite when 15.6 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 25.8 | +65.4% Kimi K2.7 Code is 65.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $992.88 | +537.0% Kimi K2.7 Code is 6.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.06s | 46.45s | +666.5% Kimi K2.7 Code is 666.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 65.4% more intelligence, 537.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 666.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteKimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill