Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: 9.0% less intelligence, 710.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 188.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 15.6 | 14.2 | −9.0% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 9.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $155.87 | $1,263.80 | +710.8% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 8.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 6.15s | 17.77s | +188.9% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 188.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.25 / $1.50 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteMistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill