Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 16.6 points higher (46.3 vs 29.7) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $1935; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Grok 4.7 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.7 | 46.3 | +55.9% Grok 4.7 (High) is 55.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,935.39 | $3,880.88 | +100.5% Grok 4.7 (High) is 2.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.47s | 26.80s | +9.5% Grok 4.7 (High) is 9.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 55.9% more intelligence, 100.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 9.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGrok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill