Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.7 Max
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google or Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Qwen3.7 Max vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 0.7% less intelligence, 17.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 33.6% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Qwen3.7 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.7 | 29.5 | −0.7% Qwen3.7 Max is 0.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,935.39 | $2,277.12 | +17.7% Qwen3.7 Max is 17.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.04s | 16.62s | −33.6% Qwen3.7 Max is 33.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $12.0 | $2.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.7 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewQwen3.7 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/qwen3-7-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-1-pro-preview/qwen3-7-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill