Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5.6 Terra (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or GPT-5.6 Terra (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Terra (High) scores 12.0 points higher (34.2 vs 22.2) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($768 vs $366; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-5.6 Terra (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | GPT-5.6 Terra (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 34.2 | +54.1% GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is 54.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $767.78 | +110.0% GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is 2.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.09s | 6.43s | −29.3% GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is 29.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Terra (High) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 54.1% more intelligence, 110.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 29.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-5.6 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteGPT-5.6 Terra (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/gpt-5-6-terra-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/gpt-5-6-terra-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill