Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 3.6 points higher (25.8 vs 22.2) but costs 2.7× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $366; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick Kimi K2.7 Code when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 25.8 | +16.2% Kimi K2.7 Code is 16.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $992.88 | +171.6% Kimi K2.7 Code is 2.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.60s | 46.75s | +443.6% Kimi K2.7 Code is 443.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 16.2% more intelligence, 171.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 443.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteKimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill