Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K2.7 Code
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Kimi K2.7 Code by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K2.7 Code scores 3.6 points higher (26.3 vs 22.7) but costs 3.7× as much to run the benchmark ($993 vs $267; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K2.7 Code when you need intelligence above 22.7, and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when 22.7 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Kimi K2.7 Code | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.7 | 26.3 | +15.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 15.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $266.94 | $992.88 | +271.9% Kimi K2.7 Code is 3.7× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.82s | 41.22s | +367.3% Kimi K2.7 Code is 367.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 15.9% more intelligence, 271.9% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 367.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 34.80 for $179.
- Kimi K2.7 Code is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteKimi K2.7 CodeToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/kimi-k2-7-code · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/kimi-k2-7-code?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill