Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 32.9 points higher (55.1 vs 22.2) but costs 8.5× as much to run the benchmark ($3117 vs $366; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Kimi K3.1 Pro when you need intelligence above 22.2, and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite when 22.2 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 55.1 | +148.2% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 2.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $3,117.31 | +752.6% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 8.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.60s | 42.64s | +395.8% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 395.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 148.2% more intelligence, 752.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 395.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteKimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill