Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 17.1% more intelligence, 36.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 483.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 26.0 | +17.1% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 17.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $231.08 | −36.8% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 36.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.50s | 49.58s | +483.3% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 483.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteMiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill