Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 58.6% less intelligence, 10.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 25.1% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 9.2 | −58.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 58.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $405.10 | +10.8% Qwen3 Coder Next is 10.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.60s | 6.44s | −25.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 25.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill