Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-08-19.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 43.0% less intelligence, 63.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 55.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.4 | 21.3 | −43.0% Qwen3 Coder Next is 43.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $153.39 | $250.18 | +63.1% Qwen3 Coder Next is 63.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.27s | 4.97s | −55.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 55.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 50.10 for $95.1.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (max) scores 52.30 for $172.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill