Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-09.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 55.5% less intelligence, 78.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 37.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.7 | 10.1 | −55.5% Qwen3 Coder Next is 55.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $266.94 | $476.03 | +78.3% Qwen3 Coder Next is 78.3% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.82s | 5.52s | −37.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 37.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Not reported | Not reported |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-5.6 Luna (xhigh) scores 34.80 for $179.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GLM-5.3-Flash scores 41.90 for $280.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill