Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Qwen3 Coder Next by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-09-22.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 58.6% less intelligence, 78.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 44.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 9.2 | −58.6% Qwen3 Coder Next is 58.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $266.94 | $476.23 | +78.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 78.4% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 12.50s | 6.95s | −44.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 44.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.35 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteQwen3 Coder NextToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill