Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Beam 1.0
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite by Google or Beam 1.0 by Reflection? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Beam 1.0
Beam 1.0 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: 36.5% more intelligence, 12.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 6.7% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Beam 1.0 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 22.2 | 30.3 | +36.5% Beam 1.0 is 36.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $365.63 | $318.73 | −12.8% Beam 1.0 is 12.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 8.60s | 8.02s | −6.7% Beam 1.0 is 6.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $2.50 | $0.40 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Beam 1.0 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteBeam 1.0Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/reflection-beam · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash-lite/reflection-beam?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill