Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs Gemini 4 Argon (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google or Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Gemini 4 Argon (High)
Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High): 61.3% more intelligence, 43.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 294.6% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 32.6 | 52.6 | +61.3% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 61.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $4,222.12 | $2,407.24 | −43.0% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 43.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.65s | 65.70s | +294.6% Gemini 4 Argon (High) is 294.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.50 / $9.00 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Gemini 4 Argon (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/gemini-4-argon · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-5-flash/gemini-4-argon?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill