Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) vs GPT-5.5 (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) by Google or GPT-5.5 (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.5 (High) scores 3.0 points higher (37.0 vs 34.0) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($3411 vs $1614; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick GPT-5.5 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.6 Flash (High).
| Metric | Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) | GPT-5.5 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.0 | 37.0 | +8.8% GPT-5.5 (High) is 8.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,614.42 | $3,410.76 | +111.3% GPT-5.5 (High) is 2.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.02s | 20.37s | +13.0% GPT-5.5 (High) is 13.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $5.00 / $30.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-5.5 (High) vs Gemini 3.6 Flash (High): 8.8% more intelligence, 111.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 13.0% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- GPT-5.5 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Gemini 3.6 Flash (High)GPT-5.5 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-6-flash/gpt-5-5-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-6-flash/gpt-5-5-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill