Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) vs Grok 4.7 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) by Google or Grok 4.7 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Low) scores 8.2 points higher (42.2 vs 34.0) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1631 vs $1614; both premium class). Pick Grok 4.7 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.6 Flash (High).
| Metric | Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) | Grok 4.7 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.0 | 42.2 | +24.1% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 24.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,614.42 | $1,630.69 | +1.0% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 1.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 19.55s | 11.26s | −42.4% Grok 4.7 (Low) is 42.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Low) vs Gemini 3.6 Flash (High): 24.1% more intelligence, 1.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 42.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.6 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Grok 4.7 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Gemini 3.6 Flash (High)Grok 4.7 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-6-flash/grok-4-7-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-6-flash/grok-4-7-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill