Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs Grok 4.6 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google or Grok 4.6 (Low) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) scores 4.7 points higher (39.8 vs 35.1) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($1100 vs $614; both premium class). Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.6 (Low).
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | Grok 4.6 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.8 | 35.1 | −11.8% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 11.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,100.06 | $613.92 | −44.2% Grok 4.6 (Low) is 44.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 13.36s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Grok 4.6 (Low) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium): 11.8% less intelligence, 44.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Grok 4.6 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)Grok 4.6 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/grok-4-6-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/grok-4-6-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill