Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Qwen3.8 Max scores 0.4 points higher (40.2 vs 39.8) but costs 2.9× as much to run the benchmark ($3172 vs $1100; flagship vs premium cost classes). Pick Qwen3.8 Max when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium).
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.8 | 40.2 | +1.0% Qwen3.8 Max is 1.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,100.06 | $3,172.37 | +188.4% Qwen3.8 Max is 2.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | Not reported | 64.64s | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Video |
Qwen3.8 Max vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium): 1.0% more intelligence, 188.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash-medium/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill