Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 28.9 points higher (59.4 vs 30.5) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $5764; both flagship class). Pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.8 Flash (High).
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 30.5 | 59.4 | +94.8% Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is 94.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,763.75 | $8,239.69 | +43.0% Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is 43.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 30.21s | 105.19s | +248.2% Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is 248.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 94.8% more intelligence, 43.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 248.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.00 for $4766.
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Gemini 4 Carbon (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/gemini-4-carbon · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/gemini-4-carbon?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill