Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) scores 14.4 points higher (40.9 vs 26.5) but costs 5.7× as much to run the benchmark ($1623 vs $286; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 26.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when 26.5 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.9 | 26.5 | −35.2% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 35.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,622.73 | $286.07 | −82.4% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 82.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 32.17s | 6.31s | −80.4% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 80.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 35.2% less intelligence, 82.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 80.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill