Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) by Google or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) scores 25.3 points higher (40.9 vs 15.6) but costs 2.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1623 vs $661; both premium class). Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 40.9 | 15.6 | −61.9% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 61.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,622.73 | $661.29 | −59.2% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 59.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.02s | 21.36s | −26.4% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 26.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.75 / $3.75 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (High): 61.9% less intelligence, 59.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 26.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-3-8-flash/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill