Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs Llama 4 Scout
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google or Llama 4 Scout by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 46.1 points higher (52.6 vs 6.5) but costs 33× as much to run the benchmark ($2407 vs $73.6; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when you need intelligence above 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout when 6.5 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | Llama 4 Scout | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.6 | 6.5 | −87.6% Llama 4 Scout is 87.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,407.24 | $73.56 | −96.9% Llama 4 Scout is 96.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 64.75s | 4.99s | −92.3% Llama 4 Scout is 92.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.18 / $0.66 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 4 Argon (High): 87.6% less intelligence, 96.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 92.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (High, Default Fallback) scores 53.60 for $2172.
- Llama 4 Scout is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Xhigh) scores 34.60 for $66.8.
Gemini 4 Argon (High)Llama 4 ScoutToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/llama-4-scout · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/llama-4-scout?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill