Gemini 4 Argon (High) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Argon (High) by Google or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Argon (High) scores 39.9 points higher (52.6 vs 12.7) but costs 9.0× as much to run the benchmark ($2101 vs $234; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Argon (High) when you need intelligence above 12.7, and Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) when 12.7 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Argon (High) | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 52.6 | 12.7 | −75.9% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 75.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,101.26 | $233.56 | −88.9% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 88.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 56.99s | 21.63s | −62.0% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 62.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 4 Argon (High): 75.9% less intelligence, 88.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 62.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Argon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemini 4 Argon (High)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-argon/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill