Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) vs Kimi K3 (Low)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) by Google or Kimi K3 (Low) by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-04.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) scores 36.8 points higher (54.2 vs 17.4) but costs 3.2× as much to run the benchmark ($5725 vs $1764; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) when you need intelligence above 17.4, and Kimi K3 (Low) when 17.4 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) | Kimi K3 (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 54.2 | 17.4 | −67.9% Kimi K3 (Low) is 67.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,725.02 | $1,763.52 | −69.2% Kimi K3 (Low) is 69.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.28s | 52.46s | +222.2% Kimi K3 (Low) is 222.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $3.00 / $15.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Kimi K3 (Low) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Low): 67.9% less intelligence, 69.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 222.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.40 for $4766.
- Kimi K3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low)Kimi K3 (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-low/kimi-k3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-low/kimi-k3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill