Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) vs Mistral Large 4 (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) by Google or Mistral Large 4 (High) by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-11-04.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) scores 28.1 points higher (54.2 vs 26.1) but costs 4.2× as much to run the benchmark ($5725 vs $1359; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) when you need intelligence above 26.1, and Mistral Large 4 (High) when 26.1 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) | Mistral Large 4 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 54.2 | 26.1 | −51.8% Mistral Large 4 (High) is 51.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $5,725.02 | $1,359.47 | −76.3% Mistral Large 4 (High) is 76.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 16.28s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $0.70 / $2.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 4 (High) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (Low): 51.8% less intelligence, 76.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.40 for $4766.
- Mistral Large 4 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.60 for $1124.
Gemini 4 Carbon (Low)Mistral Large 4 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-low/mistral-large-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon-low/mistral-large-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill