Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google or GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-28.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 24.9 points higher (59.4 vs 34.5) but costs 35× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $238; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when you need intelligence above 34.5, and GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) when 34.5 is enough.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 59.4 | 34.5 | −41.9% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 41.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,239.69 | $237.91 | −97.1% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 97.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 105.72s | 9.49s | −91.0% GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is 91.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High): 41.9% less intelligence, 97.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 38.10 for $190.
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/gpt-6-1-sol-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/gpt-6-1-sol-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill