Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google or Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 25.1 points higher (59.4 vs 34.3) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $5784; both flagship class). Pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.7 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 59.4 | 34.3 | −42.3% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 42.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,239.69 | $5,784.27 | −29.8% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 29.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 102.49s | 35.41s | −65.5% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 65.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High): 42.3% less intelligence, 29.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 65.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.00 for $4766.
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/grok-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/grok-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill