Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google or Kimi K3.1 Pro by Kimi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 13.4 points higher (59.4 vs 46.0) but costs 2.6× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $3153; both flagship class). Pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Kimi K3.1 Pro.
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 59.4 | 46.0 | −22.6% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 22.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,239.69 | $3,152.80 | −61.7% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 61.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 102.49s | 72.89s | −28.9% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 28.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High): 22.6% less intelligence, 61.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 28.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Kimi K3.1 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 54.50 for $1124.
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)Kimi K3.1 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill