Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
Which is better for the money: Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google or Qwen3.8 Max (0902) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 25.8 points higher (59.4 vs 33.6) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $6354; both flagship class). Pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.8 Max (0902).
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 59.4 | 33.6 | −43.4% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 43.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $8,239.69 | $6,353.83 | −22.9% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 22.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 105.19s | 64.34s | −38.8% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 38.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $4.00 / $20.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High): 43.4% less intelligence, 22.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 38.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 57.00 for $4766.
Gemini 4 Carbon (High)Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemini-4-carbon/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill