Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google or GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) scores 11.8 points higher (20.7 vs 8.9) but costs 23× as much to run the benchmark ($331 vs $14.7; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 20.7 | +132.6% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 2.3× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $14.68 | $331.24 | +2156.4% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 23× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 57.72s | 53.33s | −7.6% GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is 7.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $0.20 / $1.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 132.6% more intelligence, 2156.4% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 7.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)GPT-5.4 nano (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/gpt-5-4-nano · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/gpt-5-4-nano?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill