Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs GPT-5 mini (High)
Which is better for the money: Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google or GPT-5 mini (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5 mini (High) scores 7.9 points higher (16.8 vs 8.9) but costs 13× as much to run the benchmark ($189 vs $14.7; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5 mini (High) when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | GPT-5 mini (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 16.8 | +88.8% GPT-5 mini (High) is 88.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $14.68 | $188.66 | +1185.1% GPT-5 mini (High) is 13× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 57.75s | 58.72s | +1.7% GPT-5 mini (High) is 1.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $0.25 / $2.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
GPT-5 mini (High) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 88.8% more intelligence, 1185.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- GPT-5 mini (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)GPT-5 mini (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/gpt-5-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/gpt-5-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill