Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google or Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) scores 2.4 points higher (11.3 vs 8.9) but costs 2.9× as much to run the benchmark ($42.5 vs $14.7; both budget class). Pick Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning).
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 11.3 | +27.0% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 27.0% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $14.68 | $42.50 | +189.5% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 2.9× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 57.75s | 14.50s | −74.9% Mistral Small 4 (Reas… is 74.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 27.0% more intelligence, 189.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 74.9% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Mistral Small 4 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/mistral-small-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/mistral-small-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill