Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL scores 17.6 points higher (26.5 vs 8.9) but costs 19× as much to run the benchmark ($286 vs $14.7; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL when you need intelligence above 8.9, and Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) when 8.9 is enough.
| Metric | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.9 | 26.5 | +197.8% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 3.0× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $14.68 | $286.07 | +1848.7% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 19× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 57.75s | 6.35s | −89.0% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 89.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.02 / $0.10 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Speech, Video | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning): 197.8% more intelligence, 1848.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 89.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/gemma-4-e4b/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill