GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) by Z AI or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): 77.4% more intelligence, 86.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 26.0% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.1 | 46.3 | +77.4% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 77.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,486.78 | $206.66 | −86.1% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 86.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 60.76s | 44.97s | −26.0% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 26.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.28 / $4.07 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill