GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) by Z AI or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs GLM-5.1 (Reasoning): 51.7% more intelligence, 6.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.7% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 26.1 | 39.6 | +51.7% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 51.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,486.78 | $1,385.40 | −6.8% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 6.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 60.66s | 22.03s | −63.7% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 63.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.28 / $4.07 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-1/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill