GLM-5.2 (Max) vs gpt-oss-120b (High)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.2 (Max) by Z AI or gpt-oss-120b (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.2 (Max) scores 22.1 points higher (33.7 vs 11.6) but costs 17× as much to run the benchmark ($2097 vs $123; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.2 (Max) when you need intelligence above 11.6, and gpt-oss-120b (High) when 11.6 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.2 (Max) | gpt-oss-120b (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 33.7 | 11.6 | −65.6% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 65.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $2,097.29 | $122.71 | −94.1% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 94.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.14s | 11.44s | −59.3% gpt-oss-120b (High) is 59.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
gpt-oss-120b (High) vs GLM-5.2 (Max): 65.6% less intelligence, 94.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 59.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.2 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
- gpt-oss-120b (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
GLM-5.2 (Max)gpt-oss-120b (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/gpt-oss-120b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-2/gpt-oss-120b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill