GLM-5.3-Flash vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 4.5 points higher (46.3 vs 41.8) but costs 13× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $306; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (High) when you need intelligence above 41.8, and GLM-5.3-Flash when 41.8 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.3-Flash | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 46.3 | +10.8% Grok 4.7 (High) is 10.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $305.52 | $3,880.88 | +1170.3% Grok 4.7 (High) is 13× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 39.33s | 25.34s | −35.6% Grok 4.7 (High) is 35.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs GLM-5.3-Flash: 10.8% more intelligence, 1170.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 35.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
GLM-5.3-FlashGrok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill