GLM-5.3-Flash vs Mistral Large 3
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI or Mistral Large 3 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3-Flash scores 32.5 points higher (41.8 vs 9.3) but costs 6.6× as much to run the benchmark ($306 vs $46.4; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.3-Flash when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Mistral Large 3 when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.3-Flash | Mistral Large 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.8 | 9.3 | −77.8% Mistral Large 3 is 77.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $305.52 | $46.41 | −84.8% Mistral Large 3 is 84.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 38.89s | 7.17s | −81.6% Mistral Large 3 is 81.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.15 / $0.50 | $0.50 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 3 vs GLM-5.3-Flash: 77.8% less intelligence, 84.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 81.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GLM-5.3-FlashMistral Large 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/mistral-large-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-flash/mistral-large-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill