GLM-5.3 (Low) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3 (Low) scores 25.0 points higher (34.3 vs 9.3) but costs 23× as much to run the benchmark ($1013 vs $44.0; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GLM-5.3 (Low) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Llama 4 Maverick when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Low) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 9.3 | −72.9% Llama 4 Maverick is 72.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,012.50 | $43.98 | −95.7% Llama 4 Maverick is 95.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 31.07s | 10.45s | −66.4% Llama 4 Maverick is 66.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs GLM-5.3 (Low): 72.9% less intelligence, 95.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 66.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
GLM-5.3 (Low)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill