GLM-5.3 (Low) vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI or Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3 (Low) scores 18.7 points higher (34.3 vs 15.6) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1013 vs $661; both premium class). Pick GLM-5.3 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning).
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Low) | Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 15.6 | −54.5% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 54.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,012.50 | $661.29 | −34.7% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 34.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.49s | 21.22s | −28.0% Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Re… is 28.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.40 / $3.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) vs GLM-5.3 (Low): 54.5% less intelligence, 34.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 28.0% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
GLM-5.3 (Low)Qwen3.5 122B A10B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/qwen3-5-122b-a10b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/qwen3-5-122b-a10b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill