GLM-5.3 (Low) vs Solar Mini 4
Which is better for the money: GLM-5.3 (Low) by Z AI or Solar Mini 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GLM-5.3 (Low) scores 10.2 points higher (34.3 vs 24.1) but costs 2.0× as much to run the benchmark ($1013 vs $502; both premium class). Pick GLM-5.3 (Low) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Mini 4.
| Metric | GLM-5.3 (Low) | Solar Mini 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.3 | 24.1 | −29.7% Solar Mini 4 is 29.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $1,012.50 | $502.02 | −50.4% Solar Mini 4 is 50.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 30.79s | 25.33s | −17.7% Solar Mini 4 is 17.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $1.40 / $4.40 | $0.10 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Mini 4 vs GLM-5.3 (Low): 29.7% less intelligence, 50.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 17.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- GLM-5.3 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Solar Mini 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
GLM-5.3 (Low)Solar Mini 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/solar-mini4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/glm-5-3-low/solar-mini4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill